Johnson v. Vord, et al.

Filing 5

ORDER GRANTING defendant Sullivan's request for an extension of time to respond to complaint which will be ordered after screening by the court 2; order signed by Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/16/07. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Johnson v. Vord, et al. Doc. 5 Case 1:07-cv-00574-AWI-SMS Document 5 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff Garrison S. Johnson ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 16 rights action. Defendant Sullivan ("defendant") removed the action from Kern County Superior 17 Court to this court on April 13, 2007. In conjunction with his notice of removal, defendant moves 18 for a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint, commencing once the complaint has 19 been screened by the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. 20 Good cause having been found, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. 22 GRANTED; and 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT GARRISON S. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS VORD, et al., Defendants. / CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00574-AWI-SMS PC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SULLIVAN'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, TO COMMENCE FOLLOWING SCREENING BY COURT (Doc. 2) Defendant's request for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is Case 1:07-cv-00574-AWI-SMS Document 5 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Defendant is relieved of his obligation to respond to the complaint until directed to do so by the court, at which time defendant will be provided with thirty days to respond.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 April 16, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 The court has a large number of cases pending before it and will screen the complaint in due course. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?