Fields v. Voss et al

Filing 31

ORDER for Defendants Daley, O'Brien, and Maynard to File Answer to Complaint; Thirty Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/7/2010. Answer to Complaint due by 6/9/2010. (Sant Agata, S)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 6i0kij 25 26 27 28
O n March 22, 2010, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion to dismiss. (Doc. 30.) The c o u r t dismissed the claims against defendants Linda Clark and W .T . Voss, based on plaintiff's failure to state a claim against th e m , with leave to amend the complaint within thirty days. Id. The thirty-day time period has expired, and plaintiff has not file d an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Therefore, this action now proceeds on the original c o m p la in t filed by plaintiff on April 18, 2007, against only defendants Daley, O'Brien, and Maynard.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLEN L. FIELDS, Plaintiff, vs. W. T. VOSS, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/

1:07-cv-00595-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS DALEY, O'BRIEN, AND MAYNARD TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Allen L. Fields ("plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint on April 18, 2007. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds against defendants Patrick Daley, Mae O'Brien, and Cindy Maynard, on plaintiff's claim that they violated his rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.1 At this stage of the proceedings, defendants shall be required to file an answer to the complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Defendants Daley, O'Brien, and Maynard shall file an answer to the complaint filed by plaintiff on April 18, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

May 7, 2010

/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE