Fields v. Voss et al

Filing 34

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants renewed 33 MOTION to DISMISS, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/2/2010. (Filing Deadline: 10/5/2010.) (Marrujo, C)

(PC) Fields v. Voss et al

Doc. 34

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij On June 18, 2010, defendants Daley, O'Brien, Clark, and Maynard ("Defendants") filed a renewed motion to dismiss. (Doc. 33.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute. v. W.T. VOSS, et al., Defendants. / ALLEN L. FIELDS, Plaintiff, 1:07-cv-00595-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 33.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

September 2, 2010

/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com