Pobursky, et al. v. Madera County, et al.
Filing
245
ORDER ADOPTING in FULL the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 243 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/6/11: Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal 241 is DENIED. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
JAMES S. POBURSKY, et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8
9
Plaintiffs,
10
v.
11
MADERA COUNTY, et al.,
12
13
Defendants.
1:07cv0611 AWI DLB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Document 243)
)
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs James S. and Wanda Pobursky (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se in this
action.
On March 17, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
18
Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED. The Findings and
19
Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be
20
filed within thirty (30) days.
21
On April 25, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their objections. Defendants did not file a reply.
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a
23
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiffs’
24
objections, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record
25
and proper analysis.
26
27
28
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
4
The Findings and Recommendations dated March 17, 2011, are ADOPTED IN
FULL; and
2.
5
Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Document 241) is
DENIED.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
0m8i78
June 6, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?