Sokolsky v. Voss et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/10/2010 requiring Plaintiff to file a response to 28 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Response due by 10/13/2010). (Lundstrom, T)

(PC) Sokolsky v. Voss et al

Doc. 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MARK S. SOKOLSKY, Plaintiff, v. W. T. VOSS, et al., Defendants. /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00613-OWW-SMS PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 28)

Plaintiff Mark S. Sokolsky is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed May 5, 2008, against Defendants Voss and Bresler. On July 19, 2010, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and 2 The failure to respond to Defendants' motion in compliance with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 September 10, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE