Halliday et al v. Spjute et al

Filing 291

ORDER Re: 250 Motions in Limine, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/26/2015. (These motions in limine are premature. Defendants motion is DENIED without prejudice to refiling at a later date set by pretrial order.) (Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

MICHAEL IOANE, et al,
Plaintiffs

9
10
11

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00620-AWI-GSA
ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v.
KENT SPJUTE, et al,

(Doc. 250)

Defendants

12
13
14

Defendants have made motions in limine. Doc. 250. Defendants ask that documents be

15

excluded from trial as a penalty for discovery violations. There are outstanding motions (from

16

both sides) to compel, to allow additional interrogatories, to continue discovery cutoff, and to

17

reopen discovery. These motions in limine are premature. Defendants’ motion is DENIED

18

without prejudice to refiling at a later date set by pretrial order.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 26, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE