Halliday et al v. Spjute et al
ORDER Re: 250 Motions in Limine, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/26/2015. (These motions in limine are premature. Defendants motion is DENIED without prejudice to refiling at a later date set by pretrial order.) (Gaumnitz, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL IOANE, et al,
CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00620-AWI-GSA
ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE
KENT SPJUTE, et al,
Defendants have made motions in limine. Doc. 250. Defendants ask that documents be
excluded from trial as a penalty for discovery violations. There are outstanding motions (from
both sides) to compel, to allow additional interrogatories, to continue discovery cutoff, and to
reopen discovery. These motions in limine are premature. Defendants’ motion is DENIED
without prejudice to refiling at a later date set by pretrial order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 26, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?