Halliday et al v. Spjute et al

Filing 291

ORDER Re: 250 Motions in Limine, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/26/2015. (These motions in limine are premature. Defendants motion is DENIED without prejudice to refiling at a later date set by pretrial order.) (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL IOANE, et al, Plaintiffs 9 10 11 CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00620-AWI-GSA ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE v. KENT SPJUTE, et al, (Doc. 250) Defendants 12 13 14 Defendants have made motions in limine. Doc. 250. Defendants ask that documents be 15 excluded from trial as a penalty for discovery violations. There are outstanding motions (from 16 both sides) to compel, to allow additional interrogatories, to continue discovery cutoff, and to 17 reopen discovery. These motions in limine are premature. Defendants’ motion is DENIED 18 without prejudice to refiling at a later date set by pretrial order. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?