Ordaz v. Tate et al

Filing 87

ORDER to file Oppositions to 69 & 72 MOTIONS for SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill on 6/29/2010. (Notice of Change of Address due by 7/16/2010.) (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION RAFAEL S. ORDAZ, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD TATE, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-CV-00634-BLWMHW ORDER Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation, a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and two Motions for Summary Judgment. (Docket Nos. 62, 66, 69, & 72.) Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on May 12, 2010 (Docket No. 75), but mail sent to that address has been returned by the United States Post Office as undeliverable since that date. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Harold Tate on April 12, 2010, or to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Charles O'Brien on May 10, 2010, and the time for response has since passed. It is unclear from the ORDER - 1 record whether Plaintiff wishes to pursue this case, and whether Plaintiff's current mailing address has been provided to the Clerk of Court and the parties. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than fourteen (14) days after entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a notice of current address and any oppositions to the pending Motions for Summary Judgment. Failure to do so shall result in the granting of the Motions for Summary Judgment and dismissal of this case with prejudice. DATED: June 29, 2010 Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?