Thomas Earl Evans v. James Tilton

Filing 19

ORDER Directing Respondent to Submit Answer to Petition Following Withdrawal of Unexhausted Claims signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/6/2008. (Answer due by 3/10/2008.)(Esteves, C)

Download PDF
(HC) Thomas Earl Evans v. James Tilton Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 10 JAMES TILTON, 11 Respondent. 12 13 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 14 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 15 On February 4, 2008, the Court granted Petitioner's request to withdraw the unexhausted 16 claims and denied Respondent's motion to dismiss the instant petition as a "mixed" petition 17 containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims. (Court Doc. 18.) Accordingly, pursuant to 18 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. 21 from the date of service of this order; 22 2. 23 files his answer; and, 24 3. 25 force and effect. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: 3b142a All other provisions of the Court's May 18, 2007, order to respond remain in full Petitioner may file a traverse within thirty (30) days from the date Respondent Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition within forty-five (45) days / v. THOMAS EARL EVANS, Petitioner, CV F 07-00678 AWI DLB HC ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SUBMIT ANSWER TO PETITION FOLLOWING WITHDRAWAL OF UNEXHAUSTED CLAIMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 6, 2008 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?