Davis v. Hedgpeth
Filing
72
ORDER Continuing Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment from Court's Calendar until Motion is Ready for Consideration signed by Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 08/29/2011. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DORIAN DAVIS aka
WALI AT-TAQI DAVIS,
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00696-OWW-SKO PC
10
ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FROM COURT’S CALENDAR UNTIL
MOTION IS READY FOR CONSIDERATION
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
A. HEDGPETH,
(Doc. 53)
13
Defendant.
14
/
15
On August 2, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations
16
recommending that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed on January 31, 2011, be
17
granted. On August 22, 2011, Plaintiff sought an extension of time to file objections, which was
18
granted. The objection deadline is now October 6, 2011, and Defendant is entitled to fourteen days
19
thereafter within which to respond to any objections. Local Rule 304(d). Accordingly, in light of
20
28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is
21
ORDERED CONTINUED from the Court’s calendar until the motion is ripe for review by the
22
undersigned.1
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
August 29, 2011
emm0d6
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
1
28
This order is solely administrative and nothing further is required of the parties. Once the relevant
deadlines have expired, the Court will issue its ruling on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?