Hinds Investments. LP, et. al. v. Team Enterprises, Inc, et. al.

Filing 70

ORDER to DENY as MOOT R.R. Street & Co., Inc.'s F.R.Civ.P. 12 54 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/22/2010. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC., et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS AND 18 THIRD-PARTY ACTIONS. 19 ___________________________________/ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: This Court DENIES as moot defendant R.R. Street & Co., Inc.'s F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss (doc. 54) given plaintiffs' filing of a second amended complaint and their representation that answering defendant Team Enterprises, Inc. does not oppose filing the second amended complaint. See F.R.Civ.P. 15(a); Williams v. Bd. of Regents Of Univ. System of Ga., 477 F.3d 1282, 1291 (11th Cir. 2007). This Court VACATES the February 16, 2010 hearing on the motion to dismiss and DIRECTS the clerk to term the motion to dismiss (doc. 54). IT IS SO ORDERED. January 22, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 1 / HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P., et al., CASE NO. CV F 07-0703 LJO GSA ORDER TO DENY AS MOOT R.R. STREET & CO., INC.'S F.R.Civ.P. 12 MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 54.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?