Felton Guillory aka Shuaibe v. James Tilton, et al.

Filing 162

ORDER signed by District Judge Roslyn O. Silver on 3/18/13: Brian Wanerman APPOINTED as counsel for Plaintiff for the limited purpose of preparing for and presenting the case at trial. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 Felton Guillory, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 James E. Tilton, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-07-00775-ROS (PC) ORDER 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 § 1983. The court finds that appointment of counsel for plaintiff is warranted. Brian 18 Wanerman has been selected from the court’s pro bono attorney panel to represent plaintiff, 19 and Mr. Wanerman has accepted the appointment. 20 Accordingly, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 22 1. Brian Wanerman is appointed as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-entitled matter 23 24 25 for the limited purpose of preparing for and presenting the case at trial. 2. Brian Wanerman shall notify Sujean Park at 916-930-4278, or via email at spark@caed.uscourts.gov, if he has any questions related to the appointment. 26 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Brian 27 Wanerman, Law Office of Brian Wanerman, 711 Ninth Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, 28 California 95814. 1 4. Mr. Wanerman is directed to several orders setting important deadlines: the Court’s 2 February 20, 2013 order (Doc. 155) setting the June 10, 2013 trial and several pretrial 3 deadlines beginning on April 1, 2013; the Court’s March 1, 2013 order (Doc. 157) resetting 4 the status conference to May 9, 2013; and the orders issued concurrently with this order, 5 resetting the settlement conference to May 21, 2013. 6 DATED this 18th day of March, 2013. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?