Landau v. Voss et al

Filing 141

ORDER Regarding Pretrial Statements, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/2/13. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 SID LANDAU, 1:07cv00815 AWI DLB PC 7 Plaintiff, 8 ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL STATEMENTS v. 9 JAMES FORREST, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff Sid Landau (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants James Forrest and Leo Adcock for excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. On July 2, 2013, the Court issued an Amended Second Scheduling Order setting the new telephonic trial confirmation hearing and trial. The order also set a schedule for the filing of pretrial statements and other trial-related motions. The parties are advised that they need not submit new pretrial statements and may stand on the statements filed in April 2012. However, in light of the discussion during the July 1, 2013, telephonic status conference relating to the possibility of additional discovery, the parties may file new pretrial statements, if warranted, within the schedule set by the July 2, 2013, order. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis July 2, 2013 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 26 L. Beck 9b0hied 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?