Landau v. Voss et al
Filing
141
ORDER Regarding Pretrial Statements, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/2/13. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
SID LANDAU,
1:07cv00815 AWI DLB PC
7
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER REGARDING
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS
v.
9
JAMES FORREST, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff Sid Landau (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants
James Forrest and Leo Adcock for excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
On July 2, 2013, the Court issued an Amended Second Scheduling Order setting the new
telephonic trial confirmation hearing and trial. The order also set a schedule for the filing of pretrial
statements and other trial-related motions.
The parties are advised that they need not submit new pretrial statements and may stand on
the statements filed in April 2012. However, in light of the discussion during the July 1, 2013,
telephonic status conference relating to the possibility of additional discovery, the parties may file
new pretrial statements, if warranted, within the schedule set by the July 2, 2013, order.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
July 2, 2013
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
26
L. Beck
9b0hied
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?