Landau v. Voss et al

Filing 75

ORDER Adopting 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER DENYING Defendants' Motion for Excessive Force against Defendants Adcock and Forrest; ORDER REFERRING Action to Magistrate Judge for further Scheduling and Proceedings signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/24/2010. (Sant Agata, S)

(PC) Landau v. Voss et al

Doc. 75

1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SID LANDAU, Plaintiff, v. W. T. VOSS, et al., Defendants. /

1:07-CV-00815-AWI-DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 48, 72)

Plaintiff Sid Landau is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's complaint, filed June 4, 2007, against Defendants Weinstein, Bresler, Kaur, Winchel, Forrest, and Adcock. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 14, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which recommended Defendants' motion for summary judgment be denied in part and granted in part. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Neither party filed a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 14, 2010, is adopted in full; Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed September 18, 2009, is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Weinstein, Bresler, and Kaur for the failure to protect claim, and in favor of Defendants Winchell, Kaur, Adcock, and Forrest for the retaliation claim; 3. Defendants' motion is DENIED for the excessive force claim against Defendants Adcock and Forrest; and 4. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further scheduling and proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 August 24, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2