Wafer v. Suesberry et al
Filing
112
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To File Opposition Or Statement Of Non-Opposition Within Twenty-One Days (ECF No. 109 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/13/2015.(Opposition due by 3/9/2015) (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
ANTHONY D. WAFER,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
W. SUESBERRY, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:07-cv-00865-AWI-BAM (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
(ECF No. 109)
Plaintiff Anthony D. Wafer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
16
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently
17
proceeds only on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Suesberry for failure to provide medication
18
in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On September 23, 2014, Defendant Suesberry filed a
19
motion for judgment on the pleadings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). To date, Plaintiff has not filed an
20
opposition, and all other motions have been resolved.
21
Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an
22
opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion within twenty-one (21) days.
23
Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this
24
action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
February 13, 2015
27
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?