James v. Scribner et al

Filing 79

ORDER, signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 6/18/10: Defendants must file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement/Amend the Complaint 52 . Defendants' response due 7/19/10.(Hellings, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pending before this Court is Plaintiff's motion to supplement/amend the complaint (Dkt. #52). Plaintiff has also filed a reply in support of this motion (Dkt. #58), however, the Court finds no record of Defendants filing a response to Plaintiff's motion. Upon review, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants must file a response to this motion (Dkt. #52) outlining what their position is with regard to Plaintiff adding new claims and parties to his complaint. Defendants shall respond within 30 days from the date of this order. DATED this 18th day of June, 2010. vs. A.K. Scribner, et al., Defendants. John E. James, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 07-880-TUC-RCC ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION