Washington v. Andrews et al
Filing
133
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to Close Case pursuant to Parties' Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Action with Prejudice; ORDERED Clerk to Vacate all scheduled dates and close case, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/29/2013. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JESSE WASHINGTON,
CASE No. 1:07-cv-00886-AWI-MJS (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE CASE PURSUANT
TO PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
J.W. ANDREWS, et al.,
(ECF No. 132)
CLERK SHALL VACATE ALL
SCHEDULED DATES AND CLOSE
CASE
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
_____________________________/
Plaintiff Jesse Washington is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and
19
in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed June 21, 2007 pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
20
Section 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim that
21
Defendants Andrews, Castro, Martinez, Moore, Rodriquez, and Rosenthal destroyed
22
his personal property, were indifferent to his medical needs, denied him access to
23
court and retaliated against him. The case is scheduled for telephonic trial
24
confirmation hearing before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii on June 3, 2013, at 3:00
25
p.m. in Courtroom 2, and jury trial before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii on August 6,
26
2013, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2.
27
28
-1-
On May 24, 2013, Plaintiff and Defendants filed a stipulation for voluntary
1
2
dismissal of the action with prejudice as to all Defendants. (ECF No. 132.)
Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the
3
4
Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to vacate all scheduled dates and close this
5
case.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
ci4d6
May 29, 2013
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?