Norwood v. Hubbard

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 3/9/2010. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED That Defendants 46 Motion for a Continuance of the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. Arizona time. (Bradley, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Kenneth Wilson Norwood, Plaintiff, vs. Suzan Hubbard, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:07-CV-00889-SMM ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion for a Continuance of the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference (Dkt. 46), which is set for March 31, 2010. Defendants request a one-week continuance because defense counsel has a trial beginning on March 29, 2010 that will likely not conclude by March 31, 2010. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for a Continuance of the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference (Dkt. 46) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. Arizona time. Defense counsel shall initiate a conference call and secure Plaintiff on the line before telephoning Judge McNamee's chambers at [phone], no later than 1:55 p.m. Arizona time, on April 6, 2010. DATED this 9th day of March, 2010.