Kopitar v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice, Signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/8/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Arellano, S.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JAMES H. WILKINS (SBN 116364) firstname.lastname@example.org WILKINS, DROLSHAGEN & CZESHINSKI LLP 6785 N. Willow Avenue Fresno, California 93710 Tel: (559) 438-2390 Fax: (559) 438-2393 Attorneys for Plaintiff BRUCE KOPITAR MARC S. HINES (SBN 140065) JOSEPH S. MCMILLEN (SBN 174561) HINES SMITH CARDER DINCEL BLAND LLP 3080 Bristol Street, Suite 540 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Tel.: (714) 513-1122 Fax: (714) 513-1123 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Defendant NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRUCE KOPITAR, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00891-OWW-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Bruce Kopitar voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action, with prejudice. The parties to the action, including Plaintiff and Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, hereby stipulate to the dismissal by and through their counsel of record.
1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; AND PROPOSED ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
The parties have agreed that each side shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 7, 2011
WILKINS, DROLSHAGEN & CZESHINSKI LLP By: /s/ James H. Wilkins James H. Wilkins Attorney for Plaintiff, Bruce Kopitar
DATED: March 1, 2011
HINES SMITH CARDER DINCEL BLAND LLP By: /s/ Marc S. Hines Marc S. Hines Joseph S. McMillen Attorneys for Defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company ORDER
Based on the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each side shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
March 8, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; AND PROPOSED ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?