Bower v. Foster Farms Dairy et al
Filing
41
ORDER denying 40 Motion to reopen action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/10/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
BARON N. BOWER,
9
CASE NO. CV F 07-0917 LJO SMS
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER TO DENY REOPENING ACTION
(Doc. 40.)
vs.
12
13
FOSTER FARMS DAIRY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
______________________________/
17
18
19
20
This Court's December 3, 2007 order dismissed this action with prejudice and closed it.
21
A December 3, 2007 judgment was entered on the order. On March 6, 2014, plaintiff Baron
22
Bower ("Mr. Bower") filed his request to reopen this action.
23
This Court thoroughly reviewed and evaluated Mr. Bower's request and the record and
24
finds no good cause to reopen this action more than six years after it was closed. A basic
25
principle of federal practice is that courts generally refuse to reopen decided matters.
26
Magnesystems, Inc. v. Nikken, 933 F.Supp. 944, 948 (C.D. Cal. 1996). This Court has fully
27
evaluated Mr. Bower's claims and has determined that they lack sufficient factual and legal
28
grounds.
Recently discovered documents do not enliven Mr. Bower's dismissed claims.
1
1
Moreover, appeal and other deadlines have long past, and no good cause exists to renew them.
2
As such, this Court DENIES Mr. Bower's request to reopen this action.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
March 10, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?