Bower v. Foster Farms Dairy et al
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE USM-285 FORMS signed by Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/29/07 ORDERING that service is appropriate for defendants: Foster Farms Dairy, Ron Foster and Dennis Bettencourt. Plaintiff to submit the Notice of Submission of Documents with attachments by 8/6/2007. (Carter-Ford, R)
Bower v. Foster Farms Dairy et al
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BARON N. BOWER, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 FOSTER FARMS DAIRY, et al., 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Baron N. Bower, appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, filed the 17 18 Dairy, Ron Foster and Dennis Bettencourt as Defendants. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. 21 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court must conduct an initial review of the 22 complaint for sufficiency to state a claim. The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof 23 if the court determines that the action is legally "frivolous or malicious," fails to state a claim 24 upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune 25 from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If the court determines that the complaint fails to state 26 27 28
Plaintiff filed a similar case, 1:04cv6634 REC DLB, in December 2004. The action was dismissed p u r s u a n t to Plaintiff's request for voluntary dismissal on February 25, 2005.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
) 1:07cv0917 LJO SMS ) ) ) ) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF ) TO FILE USM-285 FORMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
instant employment discrimination action on June 26, 2007.1 Plaintiff names Foster Farms
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
a claim, leave to amend may be granted to the extent that the deficiencies of the complaint can be cured by amendment. In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the Court must accept as true the allegations of the complaint in question, Hospital Bldg. Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital, 425 U.S. 738, 740 (1976), construe the pro se pleadings liberally in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000), and resolve all doubts in the Plaintiff's favor, Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1969). B. Analysis Plaintiff alleges that he was employed by Defendant Foster Farms until December 2002. He alleges employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Age Discrimination in Employment Act. He also alleges violation of a collective bargaining agreement and contends that he signed an unconstitutional and unconscionable agreement. ORDER The complaint appears to state cognizable claims for relief. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Service is appropriate for the following Defendants: Foster Farms Dairy Ron Foster Dennis Bettencourt 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff three USM-285 forms, three summonses, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed on June 26, 2007. 3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the Court with the following documents: a. b. Completed summons; One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 2
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. 4.
four copies of the endorsed complaint filed June 26, 2007.
Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action be dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 June 29, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?