Pulliam v. Lozano et al
ORDER Directing Service Of Subpoena Duces Tecum By United States Marshal Without Prepayment Of Cost (ECF No. 68 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/11/2011. (Service of Subpoena Duces Tecum Deadline: 11/7/2011) (Fahrney, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 JOSEPH R. PULLIAM,
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-964-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM BY UNITED
STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT
PREPAYMENT OF COST
11 M. LOZANO, et al.,
(ECF No. 68)
Plaintiff Joseph R. Pulliam (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is
proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, filed February 2,
2009, against Defendants Lozano and Mason for Eighth Amendment violations. (ECF
On September 14, 2011, the Court issued an Order granting, in part, Plaintiff’s
Motion for a Subpoena Duces Tecum, and provided notice to the parties that the Court
intended after fifteen days to issue the subpoena and direct the United States Marshal
to effect personal service. (ECF No. 68); Fed. R. Civ. P. 45; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Clerk of Court shall forward the following documents to the United States
One (1) completed and issued subpoena duces tecum to be served on:
Kelly Harrington, Warden
Kern Valley State Prison
3000 West Cecil Avenue
Delano, CA 93216
The Warden of Kern Valley State Prison is directed to produce the following
7 within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the subpoena:
CDCR 115 Rules Violation Report, and CDCR 837C Incident/Staff Report,
written by Defendant M. Lozano.
CDCR 837C Incident/Staff Report, written by Defendant L. Mason.
CDCR 837C Incident/Staff Report, written by Corrections Officer W.
Gomez, Badge No. 69326.
CDCR 837C Incident/Staff Report, written by Corrections Officer N.
Correa, Badge No. 60440.
CDCR 837C Inceident/Staff Report, written by Corrections Officer C. Rios,
Badge No. 66383. Apprise
CDCR 837C Incident/Staff Report, written by Corrections Officer S.
Stinnett, Badge No. 69373.
CDCR 837C Incident/Staff Report, written by L. Lozano, Badge No.
CDCR 837-A1 Incident/Staff Report Supplement, written by Corrections
Lieutenant F. J. Reynoso, Badge No. 49846.
CDCR 3014 Report of Findings - Inmate Interview, Including, Audio/Video
Disc, processed by prison officials as “evidence,” interview conducted by
Corrections Sergeant J. Peacock, Badge No. 67291; Video Recorder
Operated by Corrections Officer L. Lozano, Badge No. 63710.
CDCR 115 Rules Violation Report - Part C, Investigative Employee
Report, written by Corrections Officer T. Reyna, Badge No. Not Available.
CDCR 7219 Medical Report of Injury, for Plaintiff Joseph R. Pulliam,
CDCR No. D24735.
One (1) completed USM-285 form; and
Two (2) copies of this order, one to accompany the subpoena, and one for
the United States Marshals Service.
Within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, the Marshals Service is
directed to serve the subpoena in accordance with the provisions of Rule 45 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Marshals Service is directed to retain a copy of the subpoena in its file for
The Marshals Service SHALL effect personal service of the subpoena duces
tecum, along with a copy of this order, upon the entity in the subpoena pursuant
to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c).
Within ten (10) days after personal service is effected, the Marshals Service shall
file the return of service, along with the costs subsequently incurred in effecting
service. Said Costs shall be enumerated on the USM-285 form.
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 11, 2011
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?