Zepeda v. Tate et al

Filing 36

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for an Extenstion of Time to File Third Amended Complaint 35 , signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 3/18/11. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by Friday, May 6, 2011, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time to File Third 16 Amended Complaint (Doc. 35). Plaintiff requests an additional thirty days to review the 17 Court's Order (Doc. 34) dismissing Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and to draft an 18 amended complaint. (Doc. 35 at 1.) 19 Good cause appearing, 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of 21 Time to File Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 35). 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has until Friday, May 6, 2011 to file an 23 amended complaint. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by 25 Friday, May 6, 2011, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of 26 27 28 vs. Harold Tate, et al., Defendants. Jaime L. Zepeda, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 1:07-0982-SMM ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DATED this 18th day of March, 2011. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?