Howard v. Sullivan et al

Filing 42

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To File Opposition Or Statement Of Non-Opposition To Defendant Kamel's Motion To Dismiss Within Thirty Days (Doc. 40 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/1/2010. (Opposition/Non-Opposition Deadline: 7/6/2010)(Scrivner, E)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 6i0kij 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: On May 5, 2010, defendant Kamel ("Defendant") filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 40.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute. v. W. J. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. / CLARENCE E. HOWARD, Plaintiff, 1:07-cv-00988-OWW-GSA-PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KAMEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 40.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

June 1, 2010

/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE