Williams v. Grannis et al
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/24/2010. Response due by 9/27/2010.(Verduzco, M)
(PC) Williams v. Grannis et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SHADALE L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. N. GRANNIS, et al., Defendants. /
CASE NO. 1:07-CV-01008-AWI-DLB PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 72) RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Plaintiff Shadale L. Williams ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 7, 2010, Defendants N. Grannis, S. Lopez, C. Brubaker, Bautista, and Spaeth filed a motion for summary judgment. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. On June 1, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a sixty-day extension of time to file an opposition. The sixtyday time period has elapsed, and Plaintiff has yet to file an opposition. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to file an opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment within thirty days from the date of service of this order. Failure to file a timely opposition or otherwise respond will be construed as a waiver of opposition by Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 77e0d6
August 24, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?