Brush v. Woodford et al
Filing
140
ORDER Continuing Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing to August 8, 2011, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/7/11. Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 8/8/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GARY H. BRUSH,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01009-LJO-SMS PC
ORDER CONTINUING TELEPHONIC TRIAL
CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AUGUST 8,
2011
v.
J. WOODFORD, et al.,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Gary H. Brush (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A telephonic trial confirmation was
17
held on July 6, 2011, before the Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill. At the hearing, Plaintiff verbally
18
indicated that he will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly the telephonic
19
hearing was continued to July 11, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dennis Beck and Plaintiff
20
was directed to return his consent form to the Court.
21
In order for Plaintiff’s consent form to be received by the Court, the hearing set for July 11,
22
2011, shall be continued to August 8, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED
23
that:
24
1.
25
The telephonic trial confirmation hearing set for July 11, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. is
continued to August 8, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dennis Beck; and
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2.
Counsel for Defendants is required to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in the
2
telephonic trial confirmation hearing and to initiate the telephonic hearing at (559)
3
499-5672.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
July 7, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?