Brush v. Woodford et al

Filing 140

ORDER Continuing Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing to August 8, 2011, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/7/11. Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 8/8/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GARY H. BRUSH, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01009-LJO-SMS PC ORDER CONTINUING TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AUGUST 8, 2011 v. J. WOODFORD, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Gary H. Brush (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A telephonic trial confirmation was 17 held on July 6, 2011, before the Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill. At the hearing, Plaintiff verbally 18 indicated that he will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly the telephonic 19 hearing was continued to July 11, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dennis Beck and Plaintiff 20 was directed to return his consent form to the Court. 21 In order for Plaintiff’s consent form to be received by the Court, the hearing set for July 11, 22 2011, shall be continued to August 8, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED 23 that: 24 1. 25 The telephonic trial confirmation hearing set for July 11, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. is continued to August 8, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dennis Beck; and 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2. Counsel for Defendants is required to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in the 2 telephonic trial confirmation hearing and to initiate the telephonic hearing at (559) 3 499-5672. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: cm411 July 7, 2011 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?