Brush v. Woodford et al

Filing 144

ORDER Requiring Parties To Respond Within Five Days (ECF No. 139 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/12/2011. (Opposition Deadline: 7/20/2011)(Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

GARY H. BRUSH,

10

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01009-LJO-SMS PC
Plaintiff,

11

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO RESPOND
WITHIN FIVE DAYS

v.
(ECF No. 139)

12

J. WOODFORD, et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

This action is currently set for jury trial on August 29, 2011. A telephonic trial confirmation

16

hearing was held on July 6, 2011, and the case was reassigned to the Honorable Dennis L. Beck.

17

Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part

18

his motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses. (ECF No. 139.) Plaintiff seeks to have

19

additional witnesses testify by video conference to address the security and transportation concerns

20

set forth in the order. Before Plaintiff’ s motion can be addressed, Defendants must notify the Court

21

whether they object to Plaintiff’s witnesses video testimony at trial of this matter within five days.

22

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file an opposition or a

23

statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration within five days of the date of

24

service of this order.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

July 12, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1