Brush v. Woodford et al

Filing 75

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS, And Dismissing Defendant Brummel From Action Without Prejudice 66 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/31/2009. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 vs. 14 J. WOODFORD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Gary Brush ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On February 3, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations. /// /// /// /// 1 (Doc. 66) GARY H. BRUSH, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01009 LJO DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT BRUMMEL FROM ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 3, 2009, is adopted in full; and Defendant Brummel is dismissed from this action without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 March 31, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Findings and Recommendations incorrectly names a defendant Keller and not defendant Brummel on page 2 , line 14. (Doc. 66). However, the rest of the Findings and Recommendations properly identifies defendant Brummel. 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?