Enns et al v. Flores et al

Filing 419

ORDER on Plaintiffs' Request to Continue the Settlement Conference and ORDERING Defendants to Submit Oppositions, IF ANY, by 3:00PM April 25, 2014, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/24/2014. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ENNS PONTIAC, BUICK, & GMC 7 TRUCK, et al.; 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 ORELIA FLORES, et al.; 11 Defendants, NO: 1:07-CV-01043-LJO-BAM ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDERING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT OPPOSITIONS, IF ANY, BY 3:00 PM APRIL 25, 2014 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AND RELATED ACTIONS. 19 20 Pursuant to the Court’s April 1, 2014 Order, the parties to this matter, filed confidential 21 settlement conference statements in anticipation of the Court’s settlement conference set for April 29, 22 2014. Plaintiffs submitted a confidential settlement conference statement wherein Plaintiffs’ 23 explained that based on several mediations and subsequent communications between the parties, a 24 global settlement of this case has been reached in principle. As a good faith attempt to finalize 25 settlement, Plaintiffs however request a thirty day continuance of the settlement conference in order to 26 finalize lingering issues with the mediator. 27 In light of the settlement posture of this case, the Court is inclined to continue the settlement 28 conference, but will entertain any objections to a continuance on a shortened schedule. Accordingly, no later than Friday, April 25, 2014 at 3:00 P.M., Defendants shall submit directly to Judge 1 McAuliffe’s chambers at bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov, oppositions, if any, to Plaintiffs’ request for 2 a thirty-day continuance of the settlement conference initially set for Tuesday, April 29, 2014. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 24, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE _

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?