Simmons v. Hedgpeth

Filing 118

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Re-Send Court's Second Order Directing Service by the United States Marshals Service Without Prepayment of Costs, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/6/2015. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER I. SIMMONS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 GRISSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:07-cv-01058-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RE-SEND COURT’S SECOND ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS [ECF No. 83] Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 21, 2014, the Court issued a second order directing service by the United States 20 marshal. (ECF No. 83.) Pursuant to request by the United States marshal, the Court will hereby direct 21 re-service of the order to initiate re-service as to Defendants Leslie A. Sauceda, T. Ellstrom, and 22 Rufino, along with the documents submitted by Plaintiff to assist in locating and serving the un-served 23 Defendants (ECF No. 81). 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to re-serve a copy of the following documents on the 26 United States marshal: 27 a. The Court’s May 21, 2014 second service order (ECF No. 83); 28 1 b. 1 A copy of the USM-285 forms as to Defendants Leslie A. Sauceda (ECF No. 65), Rufino (ECF No. 66), and T. Ellstrom (ECF No. 68); 2 c. 3 A copy of the documents submitted by Plaintiff to assist the United States marshal with service (ECF No. 81); and 4 2. 5 All provisions of the Court’s May 21, 2014, order remain in full force and effect. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 March 6, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?