Simmons v. Hedgpeth

Filing 244

ORDER re 243 Defendants' Request for Clarification Filed 11/22/2017, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/27/17. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

CHRISTOPHER I. SIMMONS,
Plaintiff,

7
8

v.

9

GRISSOM, et al.,
Defendants.

10
11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION FILED
NOVEMBER 22, 2017
(ECF No. 243)

12
Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

13
14

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On November 22, 2017, Defendants Grissom, Keiley, Rients and St. Lucia filed a request for

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

clarification regarding the Findings and Recommendations issued this same date. (ECF No. 243.)
Defendants correctly point out that one portion of the Findings and Recommendations incorrectly
states that their motion for summary judgment should be denied, but the actual recommendation is to
grant Defendants’ motion. Accordingly, for purposes of clarification, the Findings and
Recommendations, in its entirety, should recommend that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
be granted.
Plaintiff also alleges that Defendant Akanno withheld pain medication from Plaintiff in

22
23

retaliation for filing a grievance in October 2007 about his medical treatment.

24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 27, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1