Simmons v. Hedgpeth

Filing 88

ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Further Response to Complaint Following Denial of Motion to Dismiss re 87 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 07/01/14. Twenty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER I. SIMMONS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 GRISSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:07-cv-01058-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A FURTHER RESPOSNE TO COMPLAINT FOLLOWING DENIAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF No. 87] Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On June 30, 2014, Defendants’ motion to dismiss was denied in its entirety and the matter was 20 referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings. Defendants are hereby ordered to file a furth 21 er response to the complaint within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?