Simmons v. Hedgpeth

Filing 88

ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Further Response to Complaint Following Denial of Motion to Dismiss re 87 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 07/01/14. Twenty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHRISTOPHER I. SIMMONS,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

GRISSOM, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:07-cv-01058-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE
A FURTHER RESPOSNE TO COMPLAINT
FOLLOWING DENIAL OF MOTION TO
DISMISS
[ECF No. 87]

Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On June 30, 2014, Defendants’ motion to dismiss was denied in its entirety and the matter was

20

referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings. Defendants are hereby ordered to file a furth

21

er response to the complaint within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order.

22
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 1, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1