Uribe v. McGuinness et al

Filing 91

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by District Judge G. Murray Snow on 1/6/10: Defendant Bhatt, M.D.'s Motion Revising Scheduling Order 87 is GRANTED. (Hellings, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CESAR URIBE, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Pending before this Court is Defendant Bhatt, M.D.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for vs. P.A. MCGUINNESS, et al., Defendants. / SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff, No. 1:07-cv-1064-GMS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19 Revised Scheduling Order (Dkt. # 87) and Plaintiff's Statement of No Opposition (Dkt. # 90). After 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the Motion (Dkt. # 87). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is directed to effect service of the Amended consideration,

24 Complaint on Defendant Benjamin Edger, Jr. within 21 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is 25 26 I T IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the following d e a d lin e s and discovery orders: also directed to provide a copy of this Order to Defendant Edger.

1

1 2

1.

L a s t day by which discovery requests may be submitted (discovery request

cu tof f date): A p r il 6, 2010. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5 .2 . 5. L im its on discovery. 5 .1 . In ter ro g a to rie s: No more than 25 (including subparts) by each party to a n y other party. R e q u e sts for production of documents: No more than 15 from each 4 .1 . D e f en d a n t(s ) is/are responsible for initiating the drafting and s u b m is s io n of the proposed pretrial order in the form prescribed by the a ss ig n e d trial judge. 3. 4. D is p o s itiv e motion deadline is: J u n e 4, 2010. 2 .1 . L e a v e of Court for the taking of such deposition is granted pursuant to R u le 30(a)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The deposition may b e taken by telephone at the option of defendant(s). 2. ru le s unless the parties stipulate otherwise. If defendant(s) desire to take plaintiff's deposition they may do so by no later 1 .2 . 1 .1 . N o discovery requests may be submitted after this date except by s tip u la tio n of the parties or by Court order for good cause shown. R e sp o n s e s to discovery must be filed within the time provided by the

th a n : M a y 6, 2010.

P ro p o s e d joint pretrial order lodged with the Court by: July 6, 2010 or 30

d a y s after the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, if any.

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 6 .1 . 6. 5 .4 . 5 .3 .

p a rty to any other party. R e q u e sts for admissions: No more than 10 from each party to any other p a r t y. D e p o s i tio n s : Because of the logistical problems involved, self-

re p re se n te d incarcerated parties may not take depositions without prior C o u rt permission. Such permission will not be granted except upon a s h o w in g of exceptional circumstances. D is c o v e r y disputes. T h e Court will not entertain motions to compel discovery, motions for sa n c tio n s, motions for protective orders, or the like unless and until th e re has been compliance with the following procedure: In the event o f a dispute over discovery, the parties must confer in good faith, in p erso n or by telephone, and attempt to resolve the dispute. Rule 37(a), F e d e ra l Rules of Civil Procedure. If the dispute remains unresolved, th e parties must arrange and participate in a telephonic conference with

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 th e undersigned judge prior to bringing any discovery motions. D A T E D this 6th day of January, 2010.

3