McIntosh v. Nothern California Universal Enterprises Company et al

Filing 361

ORDER on Plaintiff's 360 F.R.Civ.P. 37(c)(2) Motion for Attorney Fees signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/15/2010. This Court VACATES plaintiffs F.R.Civ.P. 37(c)(2) motion for attorney fees and the May 13, 2010 hearing on the motion. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Court VACATES plaintiff's F.R.Civ.P. 37(c)(2) motion for attorney fees and the May 13, 2010 hearing on the motion. This Court deems the motion premature given potential post-trial motions and rulings thereon. Defendants need not respond to the motion at this time. If appropriate, plaintiff may refile the motion pending the outcome of post-trial motions. If plaintiff refiles the motion, this Court ADMONISHES plaintiff specifically to: (1) attribute and allocate attorney fees that flow directly from denial of requests for admission and need to prove denied requests for admission; and (2) demonstrate calculation of reasonable fees. This Court will not accept a mere splitting of all fees incurred since denial of the requests of admission, as plaintiff currently proposes. This Court also will not comb through billings to ascertain reasonableness or need for incurred attorney fees. The clerk is directed to term doc. 360. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 vs. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES, INC., et al, Defendants. / ROGER McINTOSH, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV F 07-1080 LJO GSA ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S F.R.Civ.P. 37(c)(2) MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (Doc. 360.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 66h44d April 15, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?