McIntosh v. Nothern California Universal Enterprises Company et al

Filing 75

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/16/2009. Expert Disclosure: 6/5/2009; Supplemental Expert Disclosure: 6/25/2009; Nonexpert Discovery Cutoff: 7/6/2009; Expert Discovery Cutoff: 8/4/2009; Pretrial Motion F iling Deadlines - Non-Dispositive: 7/17/2009; Dispositive: 9/30/2009; Pretrial Motion Hearing: 10/30/2009; Pretrial Conference set for 12/17/2009 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Jury Trial set for 3/1/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Esteves, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / Jury Trial: (10-15 days est.) Pretrial Motion Hearing Deadline: Pretrial Conf.: October 30, 2009 Date: December 17, 2009 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 4 (LJO) Date: March 1, 2010 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 4 (LJO) All parties appeared Expert Discovery Cutoff: Pretrial Motion Filing Deadlines Non-Dispositive: Dispositive: August 4, 2009 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Expert Disclosure: Supplemental Expert Disclosure: Nonexpert Discovery Cutoff: June 5, 2009 June 25, 2009 July 6, 2009 ROGER McINTOSH, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-1080 LJO GSA SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA July 17, 2009 September 30, 2009 This Court conducted a scheduling conference on April 15, 2009. telephonically as follows: Jeffrey A. Travis on behalf of Plaintiff Roger McIntosh; Steven J. Hassing on behalf of Defendant Northern California Universal Enterprises Co.; Chaka Okadigbo on behalf of Defendant City of Wasco; and William L. Alexander on behalf of Defendant DeWalt CM, Inc. Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 16(b), this Court sets a schedule for this action. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. Amendment To The Parties' Pleadings Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant DeWalt CM Inc. are conferring regarding the appropriate DeWalt entity as current Defendant DeWalt CM, Inc. believes the proper party to be Dennis D. DeWalt. To that end, the parties agreed that any amendments to the pleadings would be completed on or before April 24, 2009. 2. Consent To Magistrate Judge Due to this Court's heavy caseload and its effect to hold to scheduled dates, the parties are encouraged to consent to conducting further proceedings by a United States Magistrate Judge. In any event, the parties are reminded to file the Consent form as previously requested by the court on August 7, 2008. To date, no party has filed the Consent form. 3. F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures The parties will complete initial disclosures no later than April 24, 2009. 4. Expert Witnesses Initial expert witness disclosures by any party shall be served no later than June 5, 2009. Supplemental expert witness disclosures by any party shall be served no later than June 25, 2009. Such disclosures must be made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) and shall include all information required thereunder. In addition, F.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4) and F.R.Civ.P. 26(e) shall specifically apply to all discovery relating to expert witnesses and their opinions. Each expert witness must be prepared fully to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the designations. Failure to comply with these requirements will result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, which may include the preclusion of testimony or other evidence offered through the expert witness. In particular, this Court will enforce preclusion of testimony or other evidence if F.R.Civ.P. 26(e) is not strictly complied with. 5. Discovery Cutoffs And Limits All nonexpert discovery shall be completed no later than July 6, 2009. 6. Pretrial Motion Schedule All pretrial non-dispositive motions shall be served and filed no later than July 17, 2009. All pre- 27 trial dispositive motions shall be served and filed no later than September 30, 2009. All pretrial 28 2 1 dispositive and nondispositive motions shall be set before the appropriate judge for a hearing to be 2 conducted no later than October 30, 2009. 3 Non-dispositive motions are heard on Fridays at 9:30 a.m., before the Honorable Gary S. Austin, 4 United States Magistrate Judge in Courtroom 10. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 37-251 with 5 respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped from 6 calendar. 7 In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening 8 time pursuant to Local Rule 6-142(d). However, if a party does not obtain an order shortening time, the 9 notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 37-251. 10 Counsel or pro se parties may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, providing 11 a written request to do so is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five (5) court 12 days before the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one party requests to appear by 13 telephone then it shall be the obligation of the moving part(ies) to arrange and originate a conference call 14 to the Court. 15 16 7. 17 At the pretrial conference, the Court will set filing and hearing dates for motions in limine. Settlement Conference The parties have indicated a preference to schedule the settlement conference at a later date, 18 following the outcome of the dispositive motions contemplated by the various parties. The parties were 19 advised to contact the courtroom deputy to Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin to schedule a settlement 20 conference at a later date. The following information regarding a settlement conference is provided as 21 a courtesy. 22 Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall 23 appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority to 24 negotiate and settle the case, on any terms, at the conference. 25 No later than seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit directly 26 to the Judge Austin's chambers at gsaorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a confidential settlement conference 27 statement. This statement should neither be filed with the clerk of the Court nor served on any other 28 party. Each statement shall be clearly marked "CONFIDENTIAL" with the date and time of the 3 1 mandatory settlement conference indicated prominently. Counsel are urged to request the return of their 2 statements. If such request is not made, the Court will dispose of the statement. 3 4 5 The confidential settlement conference statement shall include the following: A. B. A brief statement of the facts of the case; A brief statement of the claims and defenses (i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which 6 the claims or defenses are based), a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on the 7 claims and defenses, and a description of the major issues in dispute; 8 9 C. D. A summary of the proceedings to date; An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further pretrial and trial matters, 10 including discovery; 11 12 E. F. The relief sought; and The party's position on settlement, including the amount which the party will accept 13 to settle, realistic settlement expectations, present demands and offers, and a history of past settlement 14 discussions, offers, and demands. 15 This Court will vacate the settlement conference if the Court finds the settlement conference will 16 be neither productive nor meaningful to attempt to resolve all or part of this case. As far in advance of 17 the settlement conference as possible, a party shall inform the Court and other parties that it believes the 18 case is not in a settlement posture so the Court may vacate or reset the settlement conference. Otherwise 19 the parties shall proceed with the settlement conference in good faith to attempt to resolve all or part of 20 the case. 21 8. 22 Pretrial Conference This Court sets a pretrial conference for December 17, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 4 (LJO) 23 of this Court. The parties are directed to file a joint pretrial statement which complies with the 24 requirements of this Court's Local Rule 16-281. In addition, the joint pretrial statement should include 25 a brief factual summary and an agreed upon neutral statement of the case. An additional copy of the joint 26 pretrial statement, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF 27 and shall be e-mailed in WordPerfect format to ljoorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 28 4 1 The parties' attention is directed to this Court's Local Rules 16-281 and 16-282. This Court will 2 insist upon strict compliance with those rules. 3 At the pretrial conference, the Court will set deadlines, among others, to file motions in limine, 4 final witness lists, exhibits, jury instructions, objections, and other trial documents. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 6i0kij 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10. 9. Trial Date A ten to fifteen day jury trial is set for March 1, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 4 (LJO) of this Court. At this time, the parties request no bifurcation of issues. Effect Of This Order This order represents the best estimate of the Court and parties as to the agenda most suitable to dispose of this case. If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, the parties are ordered to notify the Court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status conference. Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations with attached exhibits, where appropriate, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the imposition of sanctions. April 16, 2009 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?