Sansone v. Lopez et al
Filing
44
ORDER DENYING 35 Motion to Compel, signed by District Judge Frank R. Zapata on 03/30/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
Richard M. Sansome,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
Lopez, et al.,
13
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 1-07-1086-FRZ
ORDER
14
15
16
Reflected as pending in this matter is a motion to compel (Doc. 35).
17
In light of the pending motion for summary judgment which remains under advisement,
18 to which Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition, this motion shall be denied at this time.
19 Moreover, the Court finds no basis upon which to grant Plaintiff’s motion to compel.
20 Accordingly,
21
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 35) is DENIED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED this 30 th day of March, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?