Sansone v. Lopez et al

Filing 44

ORDER DENYING 35 Motion to Compel, signed by District Judge Frank R. Zapata on 03/30/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

Richard M. Sansome,

10

Plaintiff,

11

vs.

12

Lopez, et al.,

13

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 1-07-1086-FRZ
ORDER

14
15
16

Reflected as pending in this matter is a motion to compel (Doc. 35).

17

In light of the pending motion for summary judgment which remains under advisement,

18 to which Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition, this motion shall be denied at this time.
19 Moreover, the Court finds no basis upon which to grant Plaintiff’s motion to compel.
20 Accordingly,
21

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 35) is DENIED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED this 30 th day of March, 2012.