Farlough v. Dawson et al

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL, DENYING 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and DENYING 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/7/2009. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On October 19, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending denial of Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and motion for injunctive relief. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. DEXTER FARLOUGH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NICHOLAS DAWSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 1:07-cv-1108 AWI YNP (SMS) (PC) ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Document # 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 19, 2009, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's motions for default judgment and injunctive relief are denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 7, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?