Hunter v. Youngblood et al

Filing 55

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/23/12. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LEROY DEWITT HUNTER, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01126-AWI-SKO PC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 9 v. 10 DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, et al., (Doc. 54) 11 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 12 / 13 14 Plaintiff Leroy Dewitt Hunter, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 15 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 on August 3, 2007. On February 9, 2012, 16 Defendant Parker filed a motion for summary judgment, and on February 10, 2012, the Court ordered 17 Plaintiff to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition within thirty days. On March 18 20, 2012, Plaintiff was granted a thirty-day extension of time to comply with the order. More than 19 thirty days have now passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order. 20 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. 22 Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute; and 23 2. 24 The failure to file a response to this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: ie14hj May 23, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?