Hunter v. Youngblood et al

Filing 70

ORDER (1) AMENDING Scheduling Order; (2) REQUIRING Defendant to NOTIFY Court within Fifteen Days whether he Wishes to Either Withdraw or Stand By Pending Motion for Summary Judgment, and (3) REQUIRING Parties to Meet and Confer and NOTIFY Pro Bono Program Director within Thirty Days whether they would like to Participate in Settlement Week signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/5/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 LEROY DEWITT HUNTER, 9 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01126-AWI-SKO PC 14 ORDER (1) AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER, (2) REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO NOTIFY COURT WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS WHETHER HE WISHES TO EITHER WITHDRAW OR STAND BY PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (3) REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND NOTIFY PRO BONO PROGRAM DIRECTOR WITHIN THIRTY DAYS WHETHER THEY WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN SETTLEMENT WEEK 15 (Doc. 69) 16 Discovery Deadline: 07/19/2013 Pretrial Dispositive Motion Deadline: 09/19/2013 10 Plaintiff, v. 11 DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 17 / 18 19 Plaintiff Leroy Dewitt Hunter, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 3, 2007. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended 21 complaint, filed on December 16, 2010, against Defendant Parker, a Kern County Sheriff’s Deputy, 22 for use of excessive physical force, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth 23 Amendment.1 On June 27, 2012, the Court appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff in light of his 24 medical condition, and pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s third status report. 25 Based on counsel’s investigation to date, the scheduling order shall be amended to allow both 26 parties to conduct further discovery and file pretrial dispositive motions. To that end, Defendant 27 28 1 It appears Plaintiff was a pretrial detainee at the time of the incident. 1 1 shall notify the Court whether he would like to either withdraw his pending motion for summary 2 judgment and re-file it later pending further discovery on his part or stand by the motion presently 3 pending. 4 Further, the parties shall meet and confer to determine whether they believe participation in 5 a settlement conference would be beneficial. During the entire week of June 10, 2013, the Eastern 6 District of California, Fresno and Sacramento Divisions, is hosting Settlement Week, during which 7 judges and volunteer mediators will conduct settlement conferences and mediation sessions at no 8 charge to the parties. After meeting and conferring, the parties shall contact Pro Bono Program 9 Director Sujean Park at (916) 930-4278 or spark@caed.uscourts.gov and inform her whether they 10 would like to participate in Settlement Week. 11 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 12 1. The deadline for the completion of all discovery is extended to July 19, 2013; 13 2. The deadline for filing pretrial dispositive motions is extended to September 14 19, 2013; 15 3. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant 16 shall notify the Court whether he would like to either withdraw his motion for 17 summary judgment pending further discovery or stand by his motion filed on 18 February 9, 2012; and 19 4. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, the parties 20 shall meet and confer regarding participation in Settlement Week and notify 21 Pro Bono Program Sujean Park whether they believe participation would be 22 beneficial. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: i0d3h8 March 5, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?