Espinoza et al v. County of Fresno

Filing 147

ORDER GRANTING the continuance of the Motion for Summary Judgment, document 142 , currently set for hearing on 3/28/2011 and CONTINUING it to 4/18/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger; order signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/9/2011. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gary M. Messing, No. 075363 James W. Henderson, Jr., No. 071170 CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP Attorneys at Law 1007 7th Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.446.5297 Facsimile: 916.446.4487 Email: gmessing@cbmlaw.com jhenderson@cbmlaw.com William B. Aitchison, No. 90642 AITCHISON & VICK, INC. 3021 NE Broadway Portland, OR 97232 Telephone: (503) 282-6160 Facsimile: (503) 282-5877 Email: will@aitchisonvick.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JUAN ESPINOZA, PAUL MARQUEZ, AARON EPPERLY and ERIC SCHMIDT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JUAN ESPINOZA, PAUL MARQUEZ, AARON EPPERLY and ERIC SCHMIDT, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, Defendant. Case No. 1:07-CV-01145-OWW-SMS ORDER AMENDING SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER DATE: MARCH 28, 2011 TIME: 10:00 A.M. COURTROOM: 3 TRIAL DATE: TBA The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing therefore, hearings on the Motions for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication of Issues by Plaintiffs and Defendant are hereby continued from March 28, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to April 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. CBM-SAC\SA091077 1 ORDER AMENDING SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER 1 2 3 4 DEAC_Signature-END: IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 9, 2011 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 emm0d64h CBM-SAC\SA091077 2 ORDER AMENDING SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?