Fields v. Velasco

Filing 31

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 29 Motion that Request Second Amended Complaint be Screened, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/13/2010. (Marrujo, C)

(PC) Fields v. Velasco

Doc. 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Kevin E. Fields, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 21, 2007. On July 1, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that his second amended complaint be screened. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. In a Findings and Recommendations (F&R) issued concurrently with this order, the Court screened Plaintiff's second amended complaint, and recommended that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his cognizable retaliation claim but that Plaintiff's IIED (intentional infliction of emotional distress) claim and claim for equitable relief be dismissed for failure to state a claim. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

KEVIN E. FIELDS, Plaintiff, v. J. M. VELASCO, et al., Defendants. /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01213-AWI-SMS PC ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT (Doc. 29)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

In light of the issuance of the screening F&R, Plaintiff's motion requesting that his second amended complaint be screened is HEREBY DENIED as moot.1

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 July 13, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff also seeks the issuance of service documents. If the F&R is adopted in full by Judge Ishii, P la in tiff will be sent two summonses and two USM-285 forms for completion and return.

1

2