Jenkins v. Perry et al
ORDER denying 80 Motion for trial transcripts at Government Expense signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/4/2010. (Lundstrom, T)
(PC) Jenkins v. Perry et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROBERT LEE JENKINS, 11 12 v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-CV-01223-DLB PC ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE (DOC. 80)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13 LT PERRY, JR., et al., 14 15 16 17 Defendants. /
Plaintiff Robert Lee Jenkins ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner in the custody of the California
18 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeded to jury 20 trial on August 31, 2010. Judgment was entered on September 1, 2010, for Defendants and 21 against Plaintiff. (Doc. 76.) Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of 22 Appeals on September 1, 2010. (Doc. 77.) Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for the 23 court to provide Plaintiff with a copy of the trial transcript, filed September 30, 2010. (Doc. 80.) 24 The Court construes this as a motion for trial transcripts at government expense. 25 A litigant who has been granted in forma pauperis status may move to have transcripts
26 produced at government expense. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f); McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 27 1500, 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991). Two statutes must be considered whenever the district court 28 receives a request to prepare transcripts at the government's expense. 1
First, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) defines the limited circumstances under which the court can
2 direct payment the government to pay for transcripts for a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c). 11 Second, 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) allows the court to order the government to pay for transcripts (c) Upon the filing of an affidavit in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) and the prepayment of any partial filing fee as may be required under subsection (b), the court may direct payment by the United States of the expenses of (1) printing the record on appeal in any civil or criminal case, if such printing is required by the appellate court; (2) preparing a transcript of proceedings before a United States magistrate judge in any civil or criminal case, if such transcript is required by the district court, in the case of proceedings conducted under section 636(b) of this title or under section 3401(b) of title 18, United States Code; and (3) printing the record on appeal if such printing is required by the appellate court, in the case of proceedings conducted pursuant to section 636(c) of this title. Such expenses shall be paid when authorized by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.
12 only if "the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the suit or appeal is not frivolous and that 13 the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by the suit or appeal." 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). 14 A request for a transcript at government expense should not be granted unless the appeal presents 15 a substantial question. Henderson v. United States, 734 F.2d 483, 484 (9th Cir. 1984). Based on 16 Plaintiff's notice of appeal, the Court finds that the appeal does not present a substantial question 17 and the request for a transcript at government expense is therefore denied. Plaintiff may renew 18 his request for a transcript at government expense with the appellate court by filing a motion in 19 that court if he wishes. 20 In addition, Plaintiff is notified that the appellate court has access to the Court's file in
21 this case, and will request any necessary documents that are in the record directly from this 22 Court. 23 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's motion for trial transcripts at government expense is
24 HEREBY DENIED. 25 26 27 28 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a
October 4, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?