De Shazo v. Hieng et al

Filing 14

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms. Service is appropriate for Hieng. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Forms, and 2 copies of the Amended Complaint filed on May 1, 2008, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/04/2010. Case Management Deadline: 3/9/2010(Martin, S)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// 1 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the first amended complaint filed May 1, 2008. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on the May 1, 2008, first amended complaint. The Court has screened Plaintiff's first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it states a cognizable claim for relief under section 1983 against Defendant Hieng for use of excessive force, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007); Alvarez v. Hill, 2008 WL 659570, No. 06-35068, *3 (9th Cir. Mar. 13, 2008). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: C/O HIENG v. C/O HIENG, Defendant. / STEVEN DESHAZO, Plaintiff, 1:07-cv-01258-OWW YNP SMS (PC) ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF AMENDED COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3.

Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the Court with the following documents: a. b. c. Completed summons; One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and Two copies of the endorsed first amended complaint filed May 1, 2008.

4.

Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

5.

The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: j14hj0 February 4, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2