Player v. Adams et al

Filing 59

ORDER Dismissing Defendant Oftedhal from Action Pursuant to 52 Notice of Death signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 05/16/2011. Oftedhal terminated from action. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 LAVELLE TYRONE PLAYER, 7 1:07-CV-01312-OWW-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT OFTEDHAL FROM ACTION PURSUANT TO NOTICE OF DEATH 8 v. 9 (DOC. 52) ADAMS, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 / 13 14 Plaintiff Lavelle Tyrone Player (“Plantiff”) is a prisoner 15 in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and 16 Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). 17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. 19 Johnson, Miller, Prulx, Rangel, Oftedhal, and Watson. 20 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in This action is proceeding against Defendants Campbell, On October 20, 2010, Defendants filed a notice of suggestion 21 of death regarding Don Oftedhal. 22 declares that she was informed by CDCR’s Legal Affairs Office 23 that Defendant Oftedhal had passed away on April 27, 2010. 24 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), 25 If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed. 1 26 27 28 Doc. 52. Defendants’ counsel 1 More than ninety days have passed since the notice of death was 2 served, and no motion for substitution has been filed. 3 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Oftedhal is 4 dismissed from this action pursuant to Defendants’ notice of 5 suggestion of death. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: May 16, 2011 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?