Player v. Adams et al
Filing
59
ORDER Dismissing Defendant Oftedhal from Action Pursuant to 52 Notice of Death signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 05/16/2011. Oftedhal terminated from action. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
LAVELLE TYRONE PLAYER,
7
1:07-CV-01312-OWW-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
OFTEDHAL FROM ACTION PURSUANT TO
NOTICE OF DEATH
8
v.
9
(DOC. 52)
ADAMS, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
12
/
13
14
Plaintiff Lavelle Tyrone Player (“Plantiff”) is a prisoner
15
in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and
16
Rehabilitation (“CDCR”).
17
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
18
§ 1983.
19
Johnson, Miller, Prulx, Rangel, Oftedhal, and Watson.
20
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
This action is proceeding against Defendants Campbell,
On October 20, 2010, Defendants filed a notice of suggestion
21
of death regarding Don Oftedhal.
22
declares that she was informed by CDCR’s Legal Affairs Office
23
that Defendant Oftedhal had passed away on April 27, 2010.
24
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1),
25
If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the
court may order substitution of the proper party. A
motion for substitution may be made by any party or by
the decedent's successor or representative. If the
motion is not made within 90 days after service of a
statement noting the death, the action by or against
the decedent must be dismissed.
1
26
27
28
Doc. 52.
Defendants’ counsel
1
More than ninety days have passed since the notice of death was
2
served, and no motion for substitution has been filed.
3
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Oftedhal is
4
dismissed from this action pursuant to Defendants’ notice of
5
suggestion of death.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
May 16, 2011
emm0d6
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?