Player v. Adams et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/22/2011 adopting 62 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 53 , 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Prulx, G. Rangel, Watson, Campbell and M. Miller are dismissed from this Action. Matter referred to Magistrate Judge for trial setting proceedings as to defendant, B. Johnson.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

LAVELLE TYRONE PLAYER,

9
10
11

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-01312-OWW-DLB PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (DOCS. 55 AND 62)

v.
WARDEN ADAMS, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13

/

14
15

Plaintiff Lavelle Tyrone Player (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se

16

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 20, 2010, Defendants filed a

17

motion for summary judgment. Doc. 55. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On June 15, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was

20

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and

21

Recommendations was to be filed within eighteen days. Doc. 62. Neither party filed a timely

22

Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

24

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

25

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

27

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 15, 2011, is adopted in full;

28

2.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed October 20, 2010, is GRANTED;
1

1

3.

2
3

Campbell, and Rangel, and against Plaintiff;
4.

4
5
6

Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Watson, Prulx, Miller,

Defendants Watson, Prulx, Miller, Campbell, and Rangel are dismissed from this
action; and

5.

The matter is referred to the magistrate judge for trial setting proceedings as to
Defendant B. Johnson.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated:
July 22, 2011
emm0d6

/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2