Medlock v. Taco Bell Corp., et al.

Filing 265

ORDER Granting Defendants Taco Bell Corp.'s and Taco Bell of America, Inc.'s Motion to Stay 250 , signed by Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/9/11. Status Conference set for 8/20/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP Layn R. Phillips (103854) (lphillips@irell.com) 2 Andra Barmash Greene (123931) (agreene@irell.com) Julie M. Davis (232488) (jdavis@irell.com) 3 Eric Hayden (254107) (ehayden@irell.com) 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 4 Newport Beach, California 92660-6324 Telephone: (949) 760-0991 5 Facsimile: (949) 760-5200 6 LITTLER MENDELSON Spencer H. Hipp (90485) (shipp@littler.com) 7 5200 North Palm Avenue, Suite 302 Fresno, California 93704-2225 8 Telephone: (559) 244-7500 Facsimile: (559) 244-7525 9 Attorneys for Defendants 10 Taco Bell Corp. and Taco Bell of America, Inc. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 FRESNO DIVISION 15 IN RE TACO BELL WAGE AND HOUR ACTIONS 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File: 1:07-cv-01314-OWW-DLB ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS TACO BELL CORP.'S AND TACO BELL OF AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY Date: August 22, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 3 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2486690 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having read and considered the parties' papers regarding Defendants Taco Bell 3 Corp.'s and Taco Bell of America, Inc.'s Motion to Stay, and after hearing the matter on August 4 22, 2011 and rendering a written decision on August 30, 2011, HEREBY ORDERS AS 5 FOLLOWS: 6 1. Defendants' motion to stay is GRANTED. All further proceedings in this action 7 with regard to Plaintiffs' Fourth Cause of Action (missed meal periods) and Fifth Cause of Action 8 (missed rest periods) are hereby stayed until the California Supreme Court issues its decision in 9 Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 165 Cal. App. 4th 24 (2008), review granted, 85 Cal. 10 Rptr. 3d 688 (2008) ("Brinker") and in Brinkley v. Public Storage, Inc., 167 Cal. App. 4th 1278 11 (2008), review granted, 87 Cal. Rptr. 3d 674 (2009) ("Brinkley"). 12 2. The parties shall provide notice to the Court when the California Supreme Court 13 issues its decision and opinion in Brinker or Brinkley. 14 3. A status conference is set for August 20, 2012 in the above-entitled Court, 15 Courtroom 3 at 10:00 a.m. 16 4. During the pendency of the stay, Plaintiffs may, if they deem it in their best 17 interests, dismiss their meal break and rest break claims without prejudice. 18 5. This stay shall not affect in any way the pending motion on class certification issues. 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: September 9, 2011 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 DEAC_Signature-END: 26 emm0d64h 27 28 -22486690 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?