Medlock v. Taco Bell Corp., et al.
Filing
394
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Further Status/Scheduling Conference from 4/1/2014 to 5/5/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/24/2014. (Hernandez, M)
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
2
3
4
5
6
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
TRACEY A. KENNEDY, Cal. Bar No. 150782
tkennedy@sheppardmullin.com
NORA K. STILES, Cal. Bar No. 280692
nstiles@sheppardmullin.com
333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1422
Telephone: 213.620.1780; Facsimile: 213.620.1398
7
MORGAN P. FORSEY, Cal. Bar No. 241207
8 mforsey@sheppardmullin.com
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
9 San Francisco, California 94111-4109
10 Telephone: 415.434.9100; Facsimile: 415.434.3947
11 Attorneys for Defendants Taco Bell Corp. and
12
Taco Bell of America, Inc.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
15
Case No. 1:07-cv-1314-SAB
16
STIPULATION and ORDER TO
CONTINUE APRIL 1, 2014
STATUS CONFERENCE
IN RE TACO BELL WAGE AND
17 HOUR ACTIONS
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Judge: Hon. Stanley A. Boone
Date: April 1, 2014
Time: 9:00 AM
Crtrm.: 9
1 TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF
2 RECORD:
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and
4 Defendants Taco Bell Corp. and Taco Bell of America, Inc. (“Defendants”), through
5 their undersigned counsel, as follows:
6 Mediation/Status Conference
7
WHEREAS, the Parties had agreed to mediate this case with mediator
8 Steven Rottman on March 6, 2014;
9
WHEREAS, Mr. Rottman subsequently informed the Parties that he
10 had a scheduling conflict on March 6, 2014 and requested that the mediation be
11 moved to April 2014;
12
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to mediate on April 29, 2014
13 instead of March 6, 2014;
14
NOW THEREFORE, to allow the Parties time to complete mediation,
15 the Parties respectfully stipulate to and request that this Court enter an order
16 continuing the April 1, 2014 status conference to May 5, 2014, or the next available
17 date thereafter, at the Court’s convenience.
18 Class Notice/Opt-Out Deadline
19
WHEREAS, the Notice to class members was mailed on January 21,
20 2014;
21
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Class Counsel, at its expense,
22 would send a reminder postcard to all Class Members that is written in both English
23 and Spanish reminding them of the opt-out deadline, and which directs them to the
24 Class Notice Website;
25
WHEREAS, the reminder postcard mailing was completed on February
26 19, 2014;
27
WHEREAS, the deadline for Class Members to opt-out from further
28 proceedings in this matter is February 20, 2014;
1
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the opt-out deadline
2 from February 20, 2014 to March 3, 2014;
3
WHEREAS, Class Counsel has agreed to accept opt-outs postmarked
4 March 3, 2014 or earlier.
5
WHEREAS, Class Counsel will modify the existing websites related to
6 Class Notice to inform Class Members that the opt-out period has been extended
7 until March 3, 2014.
8
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree that the opt-out period for Class
9 Notice is extended from February 20, 2014 to March 3, 2014.
10
11
THE PARTIES SO STIPULATE.
12
13 Dated: February 24, 2014
14
CAPSTONE LAW, APC
15
16
By
17
18
19 Dated: February 24, 2014
20
21
/s/ Matthew Theriault
Matthew Theriault
Class Counsel for Plaintiffs
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By
/s/ Morgan P. Forsey
TRACEY A. KENNEDY
MORGAN P. FORSEY
NORA K. STILES
Attorneys for Defendants Taco Bell Corp. and
Taco Bell America, Inc.
1
2
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, the Court hereby
3 continues the April 1, 2014 case status conference to May 5, 2014 at 9:00a.m.
4
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
February 24, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?