Medlock v. Taco Bell Corp., et al.

Filing 394

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Further Status/Scheduling Conference from 4/1/2014 to 5/5/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/24/2014. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 2 3 4 5 6 A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations TRACEY A. KENNEDY, Cal. Bar No. 150782 tkennedy@sheppardmullin.com NORA K. STILES, Cal. Bar No. 280692 nstiles@sheppardmullin.com 333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1422 Telephone: 213.620.1780; Facsimile: 213.620.1398 7 MORGAN P. FORSEY, Cal. Bar No. 241207 8 mforsey@sheppardmullin.com Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 9 San Francisco, California 94111-4109 10 Telephone: 415.434.9100; Facsimile: 415.434.3947 11 Attorneys for Defendants Taco Bell Corp. and 12 Taco Bell of America, Inc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 15 Case No. 1:07-cv-1314-SAB 16 STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE APRIL 1, 2014 STATUS CONFERENCE IN RE TACO BELL WAGE AND 17 HOUR ACTIONS 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Judge: Hon. Stanley A. Boone Date: April 1, 2014 Time: 9:00 AM Crtrm.: 9 1 TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF 2 RECORD: 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and 4 Defendants Taco Bell Corp. and Taco Bell of America, Inc. (“Defendants”), through 5 their undersigned counsel, as follows: 6 Mediation/Status Conference 7 WHEREAS, the Parties had agreed to mediate this case with mediator 8 Steven Rottman on March 6, 2014; 9 WHEREAS, Mr. Rottman subsequently informed the Parties that he 10 had a scheduling conflict on March 6, 2014 and requested that the mediation be 11 moved to April 2014; 12 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to mediate on April 29, 2014 13 instead of March 6, 2014; 14 NOW THEREFORE, to allow the Parties time to complete mediation, 15 the Parties respectfully stipulate to and request that this Court enter an order 16 continuing the April 1, 2014 status conference to May 5, 2014, or the next available 17 date thereafter, at the Court’s convenience. 18 Class Notice/Opt-Out Deadline 19 WHEREAS, the Notice to class members was mailed on January 21, 20 2014; 21 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Class Counsel, at its expense, 22 would send a reminder postcard to all Class Members that is written in both English 23 and Spanish reminding them of the opt-out deadline, and which directs them to the 24 Class Notice Website; 25 WHEREAS, the reminder postcard mailing was completed on February 26 19, 2014; 27 WHEREAS, the deadline for Class Members to opt-out from further 28 proceedings in this matter is February 20, 2014; 1 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the opt-out deadline 2 from February 20, 2014 to March 3, 2014; 3 WHEREAS, Class Counsel has agreed to accept opt-outs postmarked 4 March 3, 2014 or earlier. 5 WHEREAS, Class Counsel will modify the existing websites related to 6 Class Notice to inform Class Members that the opt-out period has been extended 7 until March 3, 2014. 8 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree that the opt-out period for Class 9 Notice is extended from February 20, 2014 to March 3, 2014. 10 11 THE PARTIES SO STIPULATE. 12 13 Dated: February 24, 2014 14 CAPSTONE LAW, APC 15 16 By 17 18 19 Dated: February 24, 2014 20 21 /s/ Matthew Theriault Matthew Theriault Class Counsel for Plaintiffs SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By /s/ Morgan P. Forsey TRACEY A. KENNEDY MORGAN P. FORSEY NORA K. STILES Attorneys for Defendants Taco Bell Corp. and Taco Bell America, Inc. 1 2 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, the Court hereby 3 continues the April 1, 2014 case status conference to May 5, 2014 at 9:00a.m. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 24, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?