Medlock v. Taco Bell Corp., et al.
Filing
652
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF NARANJO'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/19/2016. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SANDRIKA MEDLOCK, et al.,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 1:07-cv-01314-SAB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
(ECF No. 646)
v.
TACO BELL CORP., et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
NARANJO’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL
DOCUMENTS
Defendants.
17
18
On February 17, 2016, an order issued requiring Plaintiff Loraine Naranjo to show cause
19 for her failure to file dispositional documents in accordance with the Court’s January 5, 2016
20 order. (ECF No. 646.) On January 5, 2016, the Court had issued an order requiring Plaintiff
21 Naranjo to file dispositional documents for her individual claims within thirty (30) days of the
22 date of service of that order. (ECF No. 582.) On February 19, 2016, counsel for Plaintiff
23 Naranjo filed a declaration indicating that on February 18, 2016, he received the settlement
24 agreement fully executed back from Taco Bell through its counsel. (ECF No. 651.) In the
25 February 19, 2016 declaration, Plaintiff Naranjo also requested twenty-one (21) days to file her
26 dispositional documents. (ECF No. 651.)
27
In this instance, the Court shall discharge the order to show cause. However, counsel is
28
1
1 advised that requests for extensions of time shall be made prior to the expiration of any deadline.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the February 17, 2016 order to show cause
2
3 is discharged and that Plaintiff Naranjo is granted an extension of time of twenty-one (21) days
4 from the date of this order to file her dispositional documents.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated:
February 19, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?