Carter v. Dawson et al

Filing 129

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With Court Order 122 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/21/11. Fifteen Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
LON CARTER,

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01325-AWI-BAM PC

5
Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

6
v.
7
NICK DAWSON, et al.,

(ECF No. 122)

8
Defendants.
9

FIFTEEN DAY DEADLINE
/

10
Plaintiff Lon Carter is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant
11
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the complaint, filed September 11, 2007, against
12
Defendants Dawson and Mendoza-Powers for unconstitutional conditions of confinement in
13
violation of the Eighth Amendment. On September 15, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for
14
summary judgment. On October 12, 2011, an order issued granting Plaintiff’s motion for an
15
extension of time and ordering that the opposition to the motion for summary judgment be filed
16
within thirty days. More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition
17
or statement of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment.
18
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
19
1.

Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show

20
cause why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the
21
Court’s order; and
22
2.

The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action, with

23
prejudice.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26

Dated:
b9ed48

December 21, 2011

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1