Lamon v. Adams et al

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING 27 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/11/2009. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DERRAL ADAMS, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 16 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 17 Rule 72-302. 18 On July 31, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 19 dismissal of certain claims and defendants. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file 20 objections within thirty days. On August 14, 2009, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and 21 recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 23 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 24 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 25 proper analysis. 26 1 vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#27) BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, 1: 07 CV 01390 LJO YNP SMS (PC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 31, 2009, are adopted in full; and 2. The following claims are dismissed: Failure to prevent Constitutional violations; Access to courts; Supervisory liability; Inmate appeal policy. 3. The following defendants are dismissed: Adams; Lopez; Hoffman; Worthman; Ruiz; Jennings; Martinez; Franklin; Gomez; Yamat; Munoz. September 11, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?