Gonzales v. Price et al

Filing 62

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions (Docs. 46 , 53 , 58 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 9/2/2011. Defendants' Response due by 9/19/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL GONZALES, Plaintiff, 10 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S’ MOTIONS v. 11 12 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01391-AWI-GBC (PC) PRICE, et al., DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE DUE BY 9/19/2011 Defendants. 13 / 14 ORDER 15 16 On July 13, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Discovery. (ECF No. 46.) On August 17 12, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel and, on August 18, 2011 he field a Motion for 18 Discovery. (ECF Nos. 53 & 58.) Defendants have not responded to any of the Motions. 19 In several of the Motions, Plaintiff appears to be alleging that discovery is not 20 occurring properly. The Court would like Defendants to respond specifically to this 21 allegation along with all other allegations regarding discovery in Plaintiff’s Motions. Accordingly, not later than September 19, 2011, Defendants must file a response 22 23 to Plaintiff’s discovery motions. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: 1j0bbc September 2, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?