Gonzales v. Price et al
Filing
62
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions (Docs. 46 , 53 , 58 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 9/2/2011. Defendants' Response due by 9/19/2011. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MICHAEL GONZALES,
Plaintiff,
10
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF
NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S’
MOTIONS
v.
11
12
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01391-AWI-GBC (PC)
PRICE, et al.,
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE DUE BY
9/19/2011
Defendants.
13
/
14
ORDER
15
16
On July 13, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Discovery. (ECF No. 46.) On August
17
12, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel and, on August 18, 2011 he field a Motion for
18
Discovery. (ECF Nos. 53 & 58.) Defendants have not responded to any of the Motions.
19
In several of the Motions, Plaintiff appears to be alleging that discovery is not
20
occurring properly. The Court would like Defendants to respond specifically to this
21
allegation along with all other allegations regarding discovery in Plaintiff’s Motions.
Accordingly, not later than September 19, 2011, Defendants must file a response
22
23
to Plaintiff’s discovery motions.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated:
1j0bbc
September 2, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?